4 thoughts on “Who pays for the "crude oil treasure" for the Bank of China?”
Tami
This year, US stocks have been disconnected successively, so we also teased Buffett while we eat melon. Many people laughed and said that Buffett had only seen US stock monopolies for most of his life, but in the first half of 2020, we took a very short time. By several consecutive US stock fuses. But in the process of continued to eat melon, we suddenly broke out that Bank of China crude oil treasure lost more than 30 billion yuan, and this lost more than 30 billion yuan. Investors need to pay for it. This allows us to eat it. This allows us to eat it. At the same time, I couldn't help but shock. Why do investors pay for investors for more than 30 billion yuan in business loss? The reason why investors need to pay for crude oil treasures is mainly because crude oil treasures buy paper oil. If it does not sell it during the contract period, then the oil buyer needs to transport the oil back to his place. However, the cost of oil transportation is very high, which also causes the reason why the crude oil treasure business is still negative. The person in charge of the Bank of China crude oil treasure business did not know what for the sake of the investor's warehouse orders to the final settlement time, so it did not replace it in the disk. But this makes people even more shocking, because several other banks related businesses have been settled early. Only the Bank of China left the warehouse bill to the final settlement time without timely stop loss. But this situation is actually in the problem in the crude oil treasure contract. The next weekend of the crude oil treasure incident, ICBC and CCB completed the monthly change work at that time, but at that time, the two banks were still scolded. At that time, some investors were ridiculed which overseas investor it was I wanted to carry out losses and did not withdraw money, but what we didn't expect was that the investor ate melon and ate Chinese banks, and even made a negative oil price. However, some people think that since the Bank of China recognizes planting, why not return the oil back? This is actually going to involve the process of crude oil delivery. First of all, the ingredients of crude oil are very complicated, which requires the corresponding warehouse to store, and the transportation facilities need to be professional. Due to the epidemic cause, the scheduling of anything is very costly, so at this time, at this time The cost of transportation is even higher than the price of crude oil, so few people do it.
The main responsibility of the Bank of China should not be controlled in a timely manner, and it is not possible to help consumers do a good job of risk estimates. Therefore, the Bank of China should take the main responsibility.
What I said before is that every customer has to pay for money. Now it is said that it is to make up for this loss for the small customers, and the Bank of China will make up for it, but the big customers pay it.
This incident has shrunk the customer of 31.5 billion. Who is responsible for not being clear about it so far. It is estimated that it will be a customer. The probability of being responsible for it is relatively high, and it is not thorough to the rules. It depends on the development of the situation.
This year, US stocks have been disconnected successively, so we also teased Buffett while we eat melon. Many people laughed and said that Buffett had only seen US stock monopolies for most of his life, but in the first half of 2020, we took a very short time. By several consecutive US stock fuses. But in the process of continued to eat melon, we suddenly broke out that Bank of China crude oil treasure lost more than 30 billion yuan, and this lost more than 30 billion yuan. Investors need to pay for it. This allows us to eat it. This allows us to eat it. At the same time, I couldn't help but shock.
Why do investors pay for investors for more than 30 billion yuan in business loss? The reason why investors need to pay for crude oil treasures is mainly because crude oil treasures buy paper oil. If it does not sell it during the contract period, then the oil buyer needs to transport the oil back to his place. However, the cost of oil transportation is very high, which also causes the reason why the crude oil treasure business is still negative.
The person in charge of the Bank of China crude oil treasure business did not know what for the sake of the investor's warehouse orders to the final settlement time, so it did not replace it in the disk. But this makes people even more shocking, because several other banks related businesses have been settled early. Only the Bank of China left the warehouse bill to the final settlement time without timely stop loss. But this situation is actually in the problem in the crude oil treasure contract.
The next weekend of the crude oil treasure incident, ICBC and CCB completed the monthly change work at that time, but at that time, the two banks were still scolded. At that time, some investors were ridiculed which overseas investor it was I wanted to carry out losses and did not withdraw money, but what we didn't expect was that the investor ate melon and ate Chinese banks, and even made a negative oil price. However, some people think that since the Bank of China recognizes planting, why not return the oil back? This is actually going to involve the process of crude oil delivery. First of all, the ingredients of crude oil are very complicated, which requires the corresponding warehouse to store, and the transportation facilities need to be professional. Due to the epidemic cause, the scheduling of anything is very costly, so at this time, at this time The cost of transportation is even higher than the price of crude oil, so few people do it.
The main responsibility of the Bank of China should not be controlled in a timely manner, and it is not possible to help consumers do a good job of risk estimates. Therefore, the Bank of China should take the main responsibility.
What I said before is that every customer has to pay for money. Now it is said that it is to make up for this loss for the small customers, and the Bank of China will make up for it, but the big customers pay it.
This incident has shrunk the customer of 31.5 billion. Who is responsible for not being clear about it so far. It is estimated that it will be a customer. The probability of being responsible for it is relatively high, and it is not thorough to the rules. It depends on the development of the situation.